Logseq vs Shaarli

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureLogseqShaarli
CategoryNotes & Knowledge BaseBookmarks & Read-It-Later
LicenseAGPL-3.0GPL-3.0
LanguageClojurePHP
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM256 MB128 MB
Deploymentbinary, bare-metaldocker, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 44,329★ 3,888
First released20202013
ReplacesNotion, Roam ResearchPocket, Delicious

Why pick each one

Choose Logseq if…

  • Local-first and private
  • Great for linked thinking
  • Files stay portable
Logseq details

Choose Shaarli if…

  • Extremely lightweight
  • Easy to back up
  • Can be public or private
Shaarli details

Frequently asked questions

Is Logseq or Shaarli better?

Neither is universally better. Logseq has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Logseq and Shaarli free and open-source?

Yes. Logseq is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Shaarli under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Logseq and Shaarli with Docker?

Logseq: check the project docs for container support. Shaarli: yes.

Related comparisons