Logseq vs MarkText Workspace
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Logseq
Privacy-first outliner for networked thought
VS
MarkText Workspace
Self-hosted markdown document workspace
| Feature | Logseq | MarkText Workspace |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Notes & Knowledge Base | Office Suites |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | Clojure | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | binary, bare-metal | docker, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 44,329 | ★ 12,572 |
| First released | 2020 | 2022 |
| Replaces | Notion, Roam Research | Dropbox Paper, Notion |
Why pick each one
Choose MarkText Workspace if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 12.6k GitHub stars
Frequently asked questions
Is Logseq or MarkText Workspace better?
Neither is universally better. Logseq has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Logseq and MarkText Workspace free and open-source?
Yes. Logseq is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and MarkText Workspace under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Logseq and MarkText Workspace with Docker?
Logseq: check the project docs for container support. MarkText Workspace: yes.