AFFiNE vs MarkText Workspace
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
AFFiNE
Workspace for docs, whiteboards and databases
VS
MarkText Workspace
Self-hosted markdown document workspace
| Feature | AFFiNE | MarkText Workspace |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Notes & Knowledge Base | Office Suites |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 71,312 | ★ 12,572 |
| First released | 2022 | 2022 |
| Replaces | Notion, Miro | Dropbox Paper, Notion |
Why pick each one
Choose MarkText Workspace if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 12.6k GitHub stars
Frequently asked questions
Is AFFiNE or MarkText Workspace better?
Neither is universally better. AFFiNE has the larger community, while MarkText Workspace is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are AFFiNE and MarkText Workspace free and open-source?
Yes. AFFiNE is licensed under MIT and MarkText Workspace under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run AFFiNE and MarkText Workspace with Docker?
AFFiNE: yes. MarkText Workspace: yes.