Lodestone Core vs Nakama

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted game servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureLodestone CoreNakama
CategoryGame ServersGame Servers
LicensefreeApache-2.0
LanguageRustGo
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM512 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, one-clickdocker, kubernetes, binary
GitHub stars★ 61★ 13,121
First released20232017
ReplacesPlayFab, Firebase

Why pick each one

Choose Lodestone Core if…

  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • One-click install on common self-host platforms
  • Written in Rust
Lodestone Core details

Choose Nakama if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 13.1k GitHub stars
Nakama details

Frequently asked questions

Is Lodestone Core or Nakama better?

Neither is universally better. Nakama has the larger community, while Lodestone Core is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Lodestone Core and Nakama free and open-source?

Yes. Lodestone Core is licensed under free and Nakama under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Lodestone Core and Nakama with Docker?

Lodestone Core: yes. Nakama: yes.

Related comparisons