LocalSend vs SparkleShare

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureLocalSendSparkleShare
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseMITGPL-3.0
LanguageDartC#
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM128 MB128 MB
Deploymentbinarybare-metal, binary
GitHub stars★ 87,025★ 4,971
First released20222010
ReplacesAirDropDropbox

Why pick each one

Choose LocalSend if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 87k GitHub stars
  • Written in Dart
LocalSend details

Choose SparkleShare if…

  • Full history of every change
  • Works over plain SSH
SparkleShare details

Frequently asked questions

Is LocalSend or SparkleShare better?

LocalSend is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider SparkleShare if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are LocalSend and SparkleShare free and open-source?

Yes. LocalSend is licensed under MIT and SparkleShare under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run LocalSend and SparkleShare with Docker?

LocalSend: check the project docs for container support. SparkleShare: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons