Backrest vs LocalSend

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureBackrestLocalSend
CategoryBackup & RecoveryFile Sync & Storage
LicenseGPL-3.0MIT
LanguageTypeScriptDart
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM256 MB128 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarybinary
GitHub stars★ 7,071★ 87,025
First released20242022
ReplacesBackblazeAirDrop

Why pick each one

Choose Backrest if…

  • Makes Restic approachable
  • Good scheduling
  • Lightweight
Backrest details

Choose LocalSend if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 87k GitHub stars
  • Written in Dart
LocalSend details

Frequently asked questions

Is Backrest or LocalSend better?

Neither is universally better. LocalSend has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Backrest and LocalSend free and open-source?

Yes. Backrest is licensed under GPL-3.0 and LocalSend under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Backrest and LocalSend with Docker?

Backrest: yes. LocalSend: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons