LocalSend vs pacebin

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureLocalSendpacebin
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseMITAGPL-3.0
LanguageDartC
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM128 MB512 MB
Deploymentbinarybare-metal
GitHub stars★ 87,025
First released20222020
ReplacesAirDrop

Why pick each one

Choose LocalSend if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 87k GitHub stars
  • Written in Dart
LocalSend details

Choose pacebin if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • Written in C
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
pacebin details

Frequently asked questions

Is LocalSend or pacebin better?

LocalSend is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider pacebin if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are LocalSend and pacebin free and open-source?

Yes. LocalSend is licensed under MIT and pacebin under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run LocalSend and pacebin with Docker?

LocalSend: check the project docs for container support. pacebin: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons