LocalSend vs Cryptomator Hub

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureLocalSendCryptomator Hub
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseMITAGPL-3.0
LanguageDartJava
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM128 MB512 MB
Deploymentbinarydocker, kubernetes
GitHub stars★ 87,025★ 78
First released20222022
ReplacesAirDropBoxcryptor

Why pick each one

Choose LocalSend if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 87k GitHub stars
  • Written in Dart
LocalSend details

Choose Cryptomator Hub if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Written in Java
Cryptomator Hub details

Frequently asked questions

Is LocalSend or Cryptomator Hub better?

LocalSend is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Cryptomator Hub if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are LocalSend and Cryptomator Hub free and open-source?

Yes. LocalSend is licensed under MIT and Cryptomator Hub under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run LocalSend and Cryptomator Hub with Docker?

LocalSend: check the project docs for container support. Cryptomator Hub: yes.

Related comparisons