LocalSend vs Mazanoke

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureLocalSendMazanoke
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseMITfree
LanguageDartHTML
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM128 MB512 MB
Deploymentbinarydocker, one-click
GitHub stars★ 87,025★ 2,666
First released20222022
ReplacesAirDrop

Why pick each one

Choose LocalSend if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 87k GitHub stars
  • Written in Dart
LocalSend details

Choose Mazanoke if…

  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • One-click install on common self-host platforms
  • Active community (2.7k GitHub stars)
Mazanoke details

Frequently asked questions

Is LocalSend or Mazanoke better?

Neither is universally better. LocalSend has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are LocalSend and Mazanoke free and open-source?

Yes. LocalSend is licensed under MIT and Mazanoke under free. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run LocalSend and Mazanoke with Docker?

LocalSend: check the project docs for container support. Mazanoke: yes.

Related comparisons