LocalSend vs Lufi

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureLocalSendLufi
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseMITAGPL-3.0
LanguageDartPerl
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM128 MB128 MB
Deploymentbinarydocker, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 87,025★ 300
First released20222015
ReplacesAirDropWeTransfer, Firefox Send

Why pick each one

Choose LocalSend if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 87k GitHub stars
  • Written in Dart
LocalSend details

Choose Lufi if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in Perl
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Lufi details

Frequently asked questions

Is LocalSend or Lufi better?

LocalSend is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Lufi if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are LocalSend and Lufi free and open-source?

Yes. LocalSend is licensed under MIT and Lufi under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run LocalSend and Lufi with Docker?

LocalSend: check the project docs for container support. Lufi: yes.

Related comparisons