LMDeploy vs OpenLLM

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted local llm runners options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureLMDeployOpenLLM
CategoryLocal LLM RunnersLocal LLM Runners
LicenseApache-2.0Apache-2.0
LanguagePythonPython
Setup difficultyHardMedium
Min. RAM16,384 MB8,192 MB
Deploymentdocker, sourcedocker, kubernetes, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 7,998★ 12,452
First released20232023
ReplacesOpenAI API, Hugging Face Inference EndpointsOpenAI API

Why pick each one

Choose LMDeploy if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 8k GitHub stars
  • Written in Python
LMDeploy details

Choose OpenLLM if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 12.5k GitHub stars
OpenLLM details

Frequently asked questions

Is LMDeploy or OpenLLM better?

OpenLLM is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider LMDeploy if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are LMDeploy and OpenLLM free and open-source?

Yes. LMDeploy is licensed under Apache-2.0 and OpenLLM under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run LMDeploy and OpenLLM with Docker?

LMDeploy: yes. OpenLLM: yes.

Related comparisons