LiveKit vs plugNmeet
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted video conferencing options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
LiveKit
Scalable WebRTC infrastructure for real-time audio and video
VS
plugNmeet
Scalable, open-source web conferencing system
| Feature | LiveKit | plugNmeet |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Video Conferencing | Video Conferencing |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | Go | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, binary | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 20,181 | ★ 518 |
| First released | 2021 | 2022 |
| Replaces | Twilio, Agora | Zoom, BigBlueButton |
Why pick each one
Choose plugNmeet if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Go
Frequently asked questions
Is LiveKit or plugNmeet better?
Neither is universally better. LiveKit has the larger community; both share a hard setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are LiveKit and plugNmeet free and open-source?
Yes. LiveKit is licensed under Apache-2.0 and plugNmeet under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run LiveKit and plugNmeet with Docker?
LiveKit: yes. plugNmeet: yes.