coturn vs plugNmeet
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted video conferencing options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
coturn
Open-source TURN and STUN server for WebRTC
VS
plugNmeet
Scalable, open-source web conferencing system
| Feature | coturn | plugNmeet |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Video Conferencing | Video Conferencing |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Language | C | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, binary | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 14,274 | ★ 518 |
| First released | 2012 | 2022 |
| Replaces | — | Zoom, BigBlueButton |
Why pick each one
Choose coturn if…
- Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 14.3k GitHub stars
- Written in C
Choose plugNmeet if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Go
Frequently asked questions
Is coturn or plugNmeet better?
coturn is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider plugNmeet if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are coturn and plugNmeet free and open-source?
Yes. coturn is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and plugNmeet under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run coturn and plugNmeet with Docker?
coturn: yes. plugNmeet: yes.