Linphone vs MiroTalk
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted chat & communication options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Linphone
Open-source SIP voice, video, and messaging client
VS
MiroTalk
Free WebRTC video conferencing and meeting rooms
| Feature | Linphone | MiroTalk |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Chat & Communication | Chat & Communication |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | C++ | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | binary, source | docker, bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 500 | ★ 4,667 |
| First released | 2001 | 2021 |
| Replaces | Skype, Zoom | Zoom, Google Meet |
Why pick each one
Choose Linphone if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Written in C++
- Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Linphone or MiroTalk better?
MiroTalk is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Linphone if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Linphone and MiroTalk free and open-source?
Yes. Linphone is licensed under GPL-3.0 and MiroTalk under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Linphone and MiroTalk with Docker?
Linphone: check the project docs for container support. MiroTalk: yes.