SHSelfHostIndex

Jitsi Videobridge vs MiroTalk

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
JI Jitsi Videobridge Scalable WebRTC-compatible video routing engine VS MI MiroTalk Free WebRTC video conferencing and meeting rooms
FeatureJitsi VideobridgeMiroTalk
CategoryVideo ConferencingChat & Communication
LicenseApache-2.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageKotlinJavaScript
Setup difficultyHardEasy
Min. RAM512 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metal, sourcedocker, bare-metal, source
GitHub stars★ 3,093★ 4,667
First released20132021
ReplacesZoom, TwilioZoom, Google Meet

Why pick each one

Choose Jitsi Videobridge if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (3.1k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Kotlin
Jitsi Videobridge details

Choose MiroTalk if…

  • Quick to deploy
  • Good feature set for free
MiroTalk details

Frequently asked questions

Is Jitsi Videobridge or MiroTalk better?

MiroTalk is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Jitsi Videobridge if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Jitsi Videobridge and MiroTalk free and open-source?

Yes. Jitsi Videobridge is licensed under Apache-2.0 and MiroTalk under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Jitsi Videobridge and MiroTalk with Docker?

Jitsi Videobridge: yes. MiroTalk: yes.

Related comparisons