LibreTime vs SRS

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureLibreTimeSRS
CategoryMedia ServersMedia Servers
LicenseAGPL-3.0MIT
LanguagePHPC++
Setup difficultyHardMedium
Min. RAM2,048 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metaldocker
GitHub stars★ 940★ 29,105
First released20172025
ReplacesLive365

Why pick each one

Choose LibreTime if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in PHP
LibreTime details

Choose SRS if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 29.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in C++
SRS details

Frequently asked questions

Is LibreTime or SRS better?

SRS is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider LibreTime if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are LibreTime and SRS free and open-source?

Yes. LibreTime is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and SRS under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run LibreTime and SRS with Docker?

LibreTime: yes. SRS: yes.

Related comparisons