AzuraCast vs SRS

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureAzuraCastSRS
CategoryMedia ServersMedia Servers
LicenseApache-2.0MIT
LanguagePHPC++
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM2,048 MB512 MB
Deploymentdockerdocker
GitHub stars★ 3,972★ 29,105
First released20152025
ReplacesLive365

Why pick each one

Choose AzuraCast if…

  • Easy Docker installer
  • Comprehensive feature set
AzuraCast details

Choose SRS if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 29.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in C++
SRS details

Frequently asked questions

Is AzuraCast or SRS better?

Neither is universally better. SRS has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are AzuraCast and SRS free and open-source?

Yes. AzuraCast is licensed under Apache-2.0 and SRS under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run AzuraCast and SRS with Docker?

AzuraCast: yes. SRS: yes.

Related comparisons