AzuraCast vs Jackett

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureAzuraCastJackett
CategoryMedia ServersMedia Servers
LicenseApache-2.0GPL-2.0
LanguagePHPC#
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM2,048 MB200 MB
Deploymentdockerbare-metal
GitHub stars★ 3,972★ 15,854
First released20152023
ReplacesLive365

Why pick each one

Choose AzuraCast if…

  • Easy Docker installer
  • Comprehensive feature set
AzuraCast details

Choose Jackett if…

  • Released under the GPL-2.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 15.9k GitHub stars
  • Written in C#
Jackett details

Frequently asked questions

Is AzuraCast or Jackett better?

Jackett is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider AzuraCast if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are AzuraCast and Jackett free and open-source?

Yes. AzuraCast is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Jackett under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run AzuraCast and Jackett with Docker?

AzuraCast: yes. Jackett: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons