LibrePhotos vs SeaweedFS

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureLibrePhotosSeaweedFS
CategoryPhoto ManagementFile Sync & Storage
LicenseMITApache-2.0
LanguagePythonGo
Setup difficultyMediumHard
Min. RAM2,048 MB512 MB
Deploymentdockerdocker, kubernetes, binary
GitHub stars★ 8,021★ 33,952
First released20202015
ReplacesGoogle PhotosAmazon S3

Why pick each one

Choose LibrePhotos if…

  • Smart organization features
  • Permissive license
  • Privacy-friendly
LibrePhotos details

Choose SeaweedFS if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 34k GitHub stars
SeaweedFS details

Frequently asked questions

Is LibrePhotos or SeaweedFS better?

Neither is universally better. SeaweedFS has the larger community, while LibrePhotos is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are LibrePhotos and SeaweedFS free and open-source?

Yes. LibrePhotos is licensed under MIT and SeaweedFS under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run LibrePhotos and SeaweedFS with Docker?

LibrePhotos: yes. SeaweedFS: yes.

Related comparisons