LibreKB vs Mark Text
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted notes & knowledge base options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
LibreKB
Web-based knowledge base solution
VS
Mark Text
Real-time preview Markdown editor for the desktop
| Feature | LibreKB | Mark Text |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Notes & Knowledge Base | Notes & Knowledge Base |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | PHP | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal | source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 60 | ★ 59,781 |
| First released | 2025 | 2017 |
| Replaces | — | Typora |
Why pick each one
Choose LibreKB if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Written in PHP
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Choose Mark Text if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Mature project with 59.8k GitHub stars
- Written in TypeScript
Frequently asked questions
Is LibreKB or Mark Text better?
Mark Text is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider LibreKB if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are LibreKB and Mark Text free and open-source?
Yes. LibreKB is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Mark Text under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run LibreKB and Mark Text with Docker?
LibreKB: check the project docs for container support. Mark Text: check the project docs for container support.