Jami vs Tox
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted chat & communication options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Jami
Fully distributed, peer-to-peer encrypted communication
VS
Tox
Peer-to-peer encrypted messaging protocol and core
| Feature | Jami | Tox |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Chat & Communication | Chat & Communication |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | C++ | C |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, binary | bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 41 | ★ 2,670 |
| First released | 2016 | 2013 |
| Replaces | Skype, Zoom, WhatsApp | Skype, Discord |
Why pick each one
Choose Tox if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Active community (2.7k GitHub stars)
- Written in C
- Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Jami or Tox better?
Neither is universally better. Tox has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Jami and Tox free and open-source?
Yes. Jami is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Tox under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Jami and Tox with Docker?
Jami: check the project docs for container support. Tox: check the project docs for container support.