LemonLDAP::NG vs SuperTokens
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted identity & sso options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
LemonLDAP::NG
Web single sign-on and access management system
VS
SuperTokens
Open-source user authentication you can self-host
| Feature | LemonLDAP::NG | SuperTokens |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Identity & SSO | Identity & SSO |
| License | GPL-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Perl | Java |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 84 | ★ 15,250 |
| First released | 2005 | 2020 |
| Replaces | Okta, PingFederate | Auth0, Firebase Auth |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is LemonLDAP::NG or SuperTokens better?
SuperTokens is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider LemonLDAP::NG if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are LemonLDAP::NG and SuperTokens free and open-source?
Yes. LemonLDAP::NG is licensed under GPL-2.0 and SuperTokens under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run LemonLDAP::NG and SuperTokens with Docker?
LemonLDAP::NG: yes. SuperTokens: yes.