Apache Syncope vs SuperTokens
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted identity & sso options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Apache Syncope
Open-source system for managing digital identities
VS
SuperTokens
Open-source user authentication you can self-host
| Feature | Apache Syncope | SuperTokens |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Identity & SSO | Identity & SSO |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Java | Java |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 2,048 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, bare-metal | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 336 | ★ 15,250 |
| First released | 2012 | 2020 |
| Replaces | SailPoint, Okta | Auth0, Firebase Auth |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Apache Syncope or SuperTokens better?
SuperTokens is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider Apache Syncope if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Apache Syncope and SuperTokens free and open-source?
Yes. Apache Syncope is licensed under Apache-2.0 and SuperTokens under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Apache Syncope and SuperTokens with Docker?
Apache Syncope: yes. SuperTokens: yes.