Lektor vs Pelican
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted blogging platforms options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Lektor
Static CMS with a built-in admin interface
VS
Pelican
Static site generator for Python and Markdown lovers
| Feature | Lektor | Pelican |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Blogging Platforms | Blogging Platforms |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Python | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | binary, source | binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 3,946 | ★ 13,331 |
| First released | 2015 | 2010 |
| Replaces | WordPress, Squarespace | WordPress, Blogger |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Lektor or Pelican better?
Neither is universally better. Pelican has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Lektor and Pelican free and open-source?
Yes. Lektor is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and Pelican under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Lektor and Pelican with Docker?
Lektor: check the project docs for container support. Pelican: check the project docs for container support.