SHSelfHostIndex

Timewarrior vs Toggl Selfhost Pomotodo

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted time tracking options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
TI Timewarrior Command-line time tracking with powerful reporting VS TO Toggl Selfhost Pomotodo Pomodoro-based time tracking and focus tool
FeatureTimewarriorToggl Selfhost Pomotodo
CategoryTime TrackingTime Tracking
LicenseMITMIT
LanguageC++Rust
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM64 MB128 MB
Deploymentbinary, sourcedocker, source
GitHub stars★ 1,637★ 5,408
First released20162018
ReplacesTogglRescueTime, Forest

Why pick each one

Choose Timewarrior if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Active community (1.6k GitHub stars)
  • Written in C++
Timewarrior details

Choose Toggl Selfhost Pomotodo if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 5.4k GitHub stars
Toggl Selfhost Pomotodo details

Frequently asked questions

Is Timewarrior or Toggl Selfhost Pomotodo better?

Neither is universally better. Toggl Selfhost Pomotodo has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Timewarrior and Toggl Selfhost Pomotodo free and open-source?

Yes. Timewarrior is licensed under MIT and Toggl Selfhost Pomotodo under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Timewarrior and Toggl Selfhost Pomotodo with Docker?

Timewarrior: check the project docs for container support. Toggl Selfhost Pomotodo: yes.

Related comparisons