Leaflet vs Mimirsbrunn
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted maps & gis options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Leaflet
Lightweight JavaScript library for interactive maps
VS
Mimirsbrunn
Geocoding engine for autocomplete address search
| Feature | Leaflet | Mimirsbrunn |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Maps & GIS | Maps & GIS |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | JavaScript | Rust |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 2,048 MB |
| Deployment | source, bare-metal | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 45,461 | ★ 7 |
| First released | 2011 | 2016 |
| Replaces | Google Maps JavaScript API | Google Places API |
Why pick each one
Choose Leaflet if…
- Released under the BSD-2-Clause license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Mature project with 45.5k GitHub stars
- Written in JavaScript
Choose Mimirsbrunn if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Rust
Frequently asked questions
Is Leaflet or Mimirsbrunn better?
Leaflet is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Mimirsbrunn if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Leaflet and Mimirsbrunn free and open-source?
Yes. Leaflet is licensed under BSD-2-Clause and Mimirsbrunn under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Leaflet and Mimirsbrunn with Docker?
Leaflet: check the project docs for container support. Mimirsbrunn: yes.