Dawarich vs Mimirsbrunn
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted maps & gis options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Dawarich
Self-hosted location history tracker and visualizer
VS
Mimirsbrunn
Geocoding engine for autocomplete address search
| Feature | Dawarich | Mimirsbrunn |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Maps & GIS | Maps & GIS |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Ruby | Rust |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 2,048 MB | 2,048 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 10,036 | ★ 7 |
| First released | 2024 | 2016 |
| Replaces | Google Maps Timeline | Google Places API |
Why pick each one
Choose Dawarich if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 10k GitHub stars
- Written in Ruby
Choose Mimirsbrunn if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Rust
Frequently asked questions
Is Dawarich or Mimirsbrunn better?
Dawarich is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider Mimirsbrunn if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Dawarich and Mimirsbrunn free and open-source?
Yes. Dawarich is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Mimirsbrunn under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Dawarich and Mimirsbrunn with Docker?
Dawarich: yes. Mimirsbrunn: yes.