lazygit vs Weblate

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted developer tools & git options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturelazygitWeblate
CategoryDeveloper Tools & GitDeveloper Tools & Git
LicenseMITAGPL-3.0
LanguageGoPython
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM64 MB3,072 MB
Deploymentbinary, sourcebare-metal
GitHub stars★ 81,130★ 6,010
First released20182023
ReplacesGitKraken, SourcetreeLocize, Transifex

Why pick each one

Choose lazygit if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 81.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in Go
lazygit details

Choose Weblate if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 6k GitHub stars
  • Written in Python
Weblate details

Frequently asked questions

Is lazygit or Weblate better?

Neither is universally better. lazygit has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are lazygit and Weblate free and open-source?

Yes. lazygit is licensed under MIT and Weblate under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run lazygit and Weblate with Docker?

lazygit: check the project docs for container support. Weblate: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons