Lancache vs Nakama

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted game servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureLancacheNakama
CategoryGame ServersGame Servers
LicenseMITApache-2.0
LanguageShellGo
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB512 MB
Deploymentdockerdocker, kubernetes, binary
GitHub stars★ 890★ 13,121
First released20202017
ReplacesPlayFab, Firebase

Why pick each one

Choose Lancache if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in Shell
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Lancache details

Choose Nakama if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 13.1k GitHub stars
Nakama details

Frequently asked questions

Is Lancache or Nakama better?

Neither is universally better. Nakama has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Lancache and Nakama free and open-source?

Yes. Lancache is licensed under MIT and Nakama under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Lancache and Nakama with Docker?

Lancache: yes. Nakama: yes.

Related comparisons