SHSelfHostIndex

Kup vs Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
KU Kup KDE backup scheduler for personal files VS BA Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone Cross-platform backup tool with deduplication and encryption
FeatureKupBackblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone
CategoryBackup & RecoveryBackup & Recovery
LicenseGPL-2.0GPL-3.0
LanguageC++Rust
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM128 MB256 MB
Deploymentbinarybinary
GitHub stars★ 100★ 500
First released20122020
ReplacesTime MachineTime Machine, Backblaze

Why pick each one

Choose Kup if…

  • Released under the GPL-2.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Written in C++
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Kup details

Choose Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Written in Rust
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone details

Frequently asked questions

Is Kup or Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone better?

Neither is universally better. Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Kup and Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone free and open-source?

Yes. Kup is licensed under GPL-2.0 and Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Kup and Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone with Docker?

Kup: check the project docs for container support. Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons