Phlare vs Peekaping
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Phlare
Self-hosted status page and incident communication tool
VS
Peekaping
Self-hosted uptime monitoring and status page service
| Feature | Phlare | Peekaping |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Monitoring & Status | Monitoring & Status |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Language | PHP | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 15,183 | ★ 1,169 |
| First released | 2014 | 2024 |
| Replaces | Statuspage, Better Uptime | Pingdom, Better Uptime |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Phlare or Peekaping better?
Neither is universally better. Phlare has the larger community, while Peekaping is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Phlare and Peekaping free and open-source?
Yes. Phlare is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and Peekaping under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Phlare and Peekaping with Docker?
Phlare: yes. Peekaping: yes.