ElkarBackup alt Snapper vs Rclone

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureElkarBackup alt SnapperRclone
CategoryBackup & RecoveryBackup & Recovery
LicenseGPL-2.0MIT
LanguageC++Go
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM64 MB128 MB
Deploymentbare-metalbinary, docker
GitHub stars★ 1,158★ 58,995
First released20112014
ReplacesTime MachineBackblaze

Why pick each one

Choose ElkarBackup alt Snapper if…

  • Released under the GPL-2.0 license
  • Active community (1.2k GitHub stars)
  • Written in C++
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
ElkarBackup alt Snapper details

Choose Rclone if…

  • Works with almost any cloud
  • Extremely versatile
  • Reliable
Rclone details

Frequently asked questions

Is ElkarBackup alt Snapper or Rclone better?

Neither is universally better. Rclone has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are ElkarBackup alt Snapper and Rclone free and open-source?

Yes. ElkarBackup alt Snapper is licensed under GPL-2.0 and Rclone under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run ElkarBackup alt Snapper and Rclone with Docker?

ElkarBackup alt Snapper: check the project docs for container support. Rclone: yes.

Related comparisons