Kopia vs Deja Dup

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureKopiaDeja Dup
CategoryBackup & RecoveryBackup & Recovery
LicenseApache-2.0GPL-3.0
LanguageGoVala
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM256 MB256 MB
Deploymentbinary, dockerbinary
GitHub stars★ 13,798★ 600
First released20192008
ReplacesBackblaze, CarboniteTime Machine, Backblaze

Why pick each one

Choose Kopia if…

  • GUI and CLI both available
  • Fast and efficient
  • Modern design
Kopia details

Choose Deja Dup if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Written in Vala
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Deja Dup details

Frequently asked questions

Is Kopia or Deja Dup better?

Neither is universally better. Kopia has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Kopia and Deja Dup free and open-source?

Yes. Kopia is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Deja Dup under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Kopia and Deja Dup with Docker?

Kopia: yes. Deja Dup: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons