Bupstash vs Rclone

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureBupstashRclone
CategoryBackup & RecoveryBackup & Recovery
LicenseMITMIT
LanguageRustGo
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM128 MB128 MB
Deploymentbinarybinary, docker
GitHub stars★ 924★ 58,995
First released20202014
ReplacesBackblaze, CrashPlanBackblaze

Why pick each one

Choose Bupstash if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Written in Rust
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Bupstash details

Choose Rclone if…

  • Works with almost any cloud
  • Extremely versatile
  • Reliable
Rclone details

Frequently asked questions

Is Bupstash or Rclone better?

Neither is universally better. Rclone has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Bupstash and Rclone free and open-source?

Yes. Bupstash is licensed under MIT and Rclone under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Bupstash and Rclone with Docker?

Bupstash: check the project docs for container support. Rclone: yes.

Related comparisons