Kong Gateway vs Urbit
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
| Feature | Kong Gateway | Urbit |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Reverse Proxy & Gateways | Reverse Proxy & Gateways |
| License | Apache-2.0 | free |
| Language | Lua | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, helm | docker, one-click |
| GitHub stars | ★ 43,947 | ★ 23 |
| First released | 2015 | 2022 |
| Replaces | AWS API Gateway, Apigee | — |
Why pick each one
Choose Kong Gateway if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Mature project with 43.9k GitHub stars
Choose Urbit if…
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- One-click install on common self-host platforms
- Written in Go
Frequently asked questions
Is Kong Gateway or Urbit better?
Neither is universally better. Kong Gateway has the larger community, while Urbit is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Kong Gateway and Urbit free and open-source?
Yes. Kong Gateway is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Urbit under free. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Kong Gateway and Urbit with Docker?
Kong Gateway: yes. Urbit: yes.