Kong Gateway vs Tor Browser

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureKong GatewayTor Browser
CategoryReverse Proxy & GatewaysReverse Proxy & Gateways
LicenseApache-2.0free
LanguageLua
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM512 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, helmdocker, one-click
GitHub stars★ 43,947★ 4,989
First released20152022
ReplacesAWS API Gateway, Apigee

Why pick each one

Choose Kong Gateway if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 43.9k GitHub stars
Kong Gateway details

Choose Tor Browser if…

  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • One-click install on common self-host platforms
  • Active community (5k GitHub stars)
Tor Browser details

Frequently asked questions

Is Kong Gateway or Tor Browser better?

Neither is universally better. Kong Gateway has the larger community, while Tor Browser is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Kong Gateway and Tor Browser free and open-source?

Yes. Kong Gateway is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Tor Browser under free. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Kong Gateway and Tor Browser with Docker?

Kong Gateway: yes. Tor Browser: yes.

Related comparisons