Kong Gateway vs Tinyauth

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureKong GatewayTinyauth
CategoryReverse Proxy & GatewaysReverse Proxy & Gateways
LicenseApache-2.0GPL-3.0
LanguageLuaGo
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM512 MB64 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, helmdocker
GitHub stars★ 43,947★ 8,092
First released20152024
ReplacesAWS API Gateway, ApigeeCloudflare Access

Why pick each one

Choose Kong Gateway if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 43.9k GitHub stars
Kong Gateway details

Choose Tinyauth if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 8.1k GitHub stars
Tinyauth details

Frequently asked questions

Is Kong Gateway or Tinyauth better?

Neither is universally better. Kong Gateway has the larger community, while Tinyauth is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Kong Gateway and Tinyauth free and open-source?

Yes. Kong Gateway is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Tinyauth under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Kong Gateway and Tinyauth with Docker?

Kong Gateway: yes. Tinyauth: yes.

Related comparisons