Kong Gateway vs Technitium DNS Server

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureKong GatewayTechnitium DNS Server
CategoryReverse Proxy & GatewaysReverse Proxy & Gateways
LicenseApache-2.0GPL-3.0
LanguageLuaC#
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM512 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, helmdocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 43,947★ 9,449
First released20152017
ReplacesAWS API Gateway, ApigeePi-hole, AdGuard Home

Why pick each one

Choose Kong Gateway if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 43.9k GitHub stars
Kong Gateway details

Choose Technitium DNS Server if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 9.4k GitHub stars
Technitium DNS Server details

Frequently asked questions

Is Kong Gateway or Technitium DNS Server better?

Neither is universally better. Kong Gateway has the larger community, while Technitium DNS Server is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Kong Gateway and Technitium DNS Server free and open-source?

Yes. Kong Gateway is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Technitium DNS Server under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Kong Gateway and Technitium DNS Server with Docker?

Kong Gateway: yes. Technitium DNS Server: yes.

Related comparisons