Kong Gateway vs Syslog-ng
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Kong Gateway
Cloud-native, fast, scalable API gateway
VS
Syslog-ng
Centralized syslog server with real-time web UI
| Feature | Kong Gateway | Syslog-ng |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Reverse Proxy & Gateways | Reverse Proxy & Gateways |
| License | Apache-2.0 | free |
| Language | Lua | C |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, helm | docker, one-click |
| GitHub stars | ★ 43,947 | ★ 2,363 |
| First released | 2015 | 2022 |
| Replaces | AWS API Gateway, Apigee | — |
Why pick each one
Choose Kong Gateway if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Mature project with 43.9k GitHub stars
Choose Syslog-ng if…
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- One-click install on common self-host platforms
- Active community (2.4k GitHub stars)
Frequently asked questions
Is Kong Gateway or Syslog-ng better?
Neither is universally better. Kong Gateway has the larger community, while Syslog-ng is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Kong Gateway and Syslog-ng free and open-source?
Yes. Kong Gateway is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Syslog-ng under free. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Kong Gateway and Syslog-ng with Docker?
Kong Gateway: yes. Syslog-ng: yes.