Kong Gateway vs Shadowsocks-libev
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Kong Gateway
Cloud-native, fast, scalable API gateway
VS
Shadowsocks-libev
Lightweight encrypted SOCKS5 proxy
| Feature | Kong Gateway | Shadowsocks-libev |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Reverse Proxy & Gateways | Reverse Proxy & Gateways |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | Lua | C |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 32 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, helm | bare-metal, source, docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 43,947 | ★ 16,181 |
| First released | 2015 | 2014 |
| Replaces | AWS API Gateway, Apigee | commercial VPN proxies |
Why pick each one
Choose Kong Gateway if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Mature project with 43.9k GitHub stars
Frequently asked questions
Is Kong Gateway or Shadowsocks-libev better?
Neither is universally better. Kong Gateway has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Kong Gateway and Shadowsocks-libev free and open-source?
Yes. Kong Gateway is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Shadowsocks-libev under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Kong Gateway and Shadowsocks-libev with Docker?
Kong Gateway: yes. Shadowsocks-libev: yes.