Koel vs LMS

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureKoelLMS
Deploy effortUnder-an-hour setupUnder-an-hour setup
Health score95 · Excellent85 · Excellent
CategoryMedia ServersMedia Servers
LicenseMITGPL-3.0
LanguagePHPC++
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB128 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metaldocker, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 17,262★ 1,680
First released20162014
ReplacesSpotifySpotify

What are Koel and LMS?

Koel

Koel is a personal music streaming server with a focus on a clean, modern web interface. It supports smart playlists, last.fm scrobbling, and streaming your own collection from any browser.

  • Elegant web player
  • Smart playlists
  • Last.fm scrobbling
  • Mobile companion app

Read the full Koel guide →

LMS

LMS is a lightweight, self-hosted music streaming server with a focus on performance and a built-in recommendation engine. It exposes the Subsonic API for compatibility with a wide range of clients.

  • Subsonic API compatible
  • Music recommendations
  • Low resource use
  • Scrobbling support

Koel vs LMS: key differences

Koel is written in PHP, while LMS is built with C++. Licensing differs — MIT for Koel versus GPL-3.0 for LMS. LMS is the lighter option, starting around 128 MB of RAM against 512 MB for Koel. LMS is the more established project (first released 2014), while Koel arrived in 2016. Koel has the considerably larger community, at 17,262 GitHub stars versus 1,680.

Why pick each one

Choose Koel if…

  • Beautiful interface
  • Active community

Watch out for

  • Needs a separate database
  • Limited transcoding options
Koel details

Choose LMS if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (1.7k GitHub stars)
  • Written in C++

Watch out for

  • Smaller community
  • Web UI is functional but plain
LMS details

Frequently asked questions

Is Koel or LMS better?

Neither is universally better. Koel has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Koel and LMS free and open-source?

Yes. Koel is licensed under MIT and LMS under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Koel and LMS with Docker?

Koel: yes. LMS: yes.

Which is lighter on resources, Koel or LMS?

LMS has the smaller minimum footprint at 128 MB of RAM, compared to about 512 MB for Koel. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.

Related comparisons