Knox vs Yopass
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted password managers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Knox
Service for storing and rotating application secrets
VS
Yopass
Securely share secrets with encrypted one-time links
| Feature | Knox | Yopass |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Password Managers | Password Managers |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | Go | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary, source | docker, kubernetes, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,268 | ★ 3,052 |
| First released | 2016 | 2016 |
| Replaces | HashiCorp Vault, AWS Secrets Manager | 1Password, Doppler |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Knox or Yopass better?
Yopass is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Knox if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Knox and Yopass free and open-source?
Yes. Knox is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Yopass under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Knox and Yopass with Docker?
Knox: yes. Yopass: yes.