Kibana vs Apache SkyWalking

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureKibanaApache SkyWalking
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseAGPL-3.0Apache-2.0
LanguageTypeScriptJava
Setup difficultyMediumHard
Min. RAM1,024 MB2,048 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, binarydocker, kubernetes, helm
GitHub stars★ 21,230★ 24,915
First released20132015
ReplacesSplunk, DatadogNew Relic, Datadog

Why pick each one

Choose Kibana if…

  • Rich visualization options
  • Mature ecosystem
Kibana details

Choose Apache SkyWalking if…

  • Full observability suite
  • Strong Apache governance
Apache SkyWalking details

Frequently asked questions

Is Kibana or Apache SkyWalking better?

Neither is universally better. Apache SkyWalking has the larger community, while Kibana is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Kibana and Apache SkyWalking free and open-source?

Yes. Kibana is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Apache SkyWalking under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Kibana and Apache SkyWalking with Docker?

Kibana: yes. Apache SkyWalking: yes.

Related comparisons