Kibana vs Monitoror
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Kibana
Visualization and exploration for Elasticsearch data
VS
Monitoror
Unified monitoring wallboard for builds and services
| Feature | Kibana | Monitoror |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Monitoring & Status | Monitoring & Status |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | TypeScript | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, binary | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 21,230 | ★ 4,382 |
| First released | 2013 | 2019 |
| Replaces | Splunk, Datadog | Datadog |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Kibana or Monitoror better?
Neither is universally better. Kibana has the larger community, while Monitoror is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Kibana and Monitoror free and open-source?
Yes. Kibana is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Monitoror under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Kibana and Monitoror with Docker?
Kibana: yes. Monitoror: yes.