Keywhiz vs Logto
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted identity & sso options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Keywhiz
Secret management and distribution system
VS
Logto
Developer-friendly authentication and authorization platform
| Feature | Keywhiz | Logto |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Identity & SSO | Identity & SSO |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MPL-2.0 |
| Language | Java | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, source | docker, kubernetes, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 2,625 | ★ 14,305 |
| First released | 2015 | 2022 |
| Replaces | HashiCorp Vault | Auth0, Firebase Auth, Clerk |
Why pick each one
Choose Keywhiz if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (2.6k GitHub stars)
- Written in Java
Frequently asked questions
Is Keywhiz or Logto better?
Logto is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider Keywhiz if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Keywhiz and Logto free and open-source?
Yes. Keywhiz is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Logto under MPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Keywhiz and Logto with Docker?
Keywhiz: yes. Logto: yes.