git-crypt vs Keywhiz
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
git-crypt
Transparent file encryption for secrets stored in git
VS
Keywhiz
Secret management and distribution system
| Feature | git-crypt | Keywhiz |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Password Managers | Identity & SSO |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | C++ | Java |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 32 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | binary, source | docker, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 9,837 | ★ 2,625 |
| First released | 2013 | 2015 |
| Replaces | HashiCorp Vault, AWS Secrets Manager | HashiCorp Vault |
Why pick each one
Choose Keywhiz if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (2.6k GitHub stars)
- Written in Java
Frequently asked questions
Is git-crypt or Keywhiz better?
git-crypt is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Keywhiz if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are git-crypt and Keywhiz free and open-source?
Yes. git-crypt is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Keywhiz under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run git-crypt and Keywhiz with Docker?
git-crypt: check the project docs for container support. Keywhiz: yes.