Keystone vs Pico

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted content management systems options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureKeystonePico
CategoryContent Management SystemsContent Management Systems
LicenseMITMIT
LanguageTypeScriptPHP
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM512 MB128 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metal, sourcebare-metal, docker, source
GitHub stars★ 9,938★ 3,904
First released20132012
ReplacesContentful, StrapiWordPress

Why pick each one

Choose Keystone if…

  • Strong TypeScript support
  • Flexible and extensible
Keystone details

Choose Pico if…

  • Extremely lightweight
  • Zero configuration to start
Pico details

Frequently asked questions

Is Keystone or Pico better?

Neither is universally better. Keystone has the larger community, while Pico is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Keystone and Pico free and open-source?

Yes. Keystone is licensed under MIT and Pico under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Keystone and Pico with Docker?

Keystone: yes. Pico: yes.

Related comparisons