Keystatic vs October CMS
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted content management systems options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Keystatic
Git-based CMS for Markdown and structured content
VS
October CMS
Laravel-based CMS focused on simplicity for developers
| Feature | Keystatic | October CMS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Content Management Systems | Content Management Systems |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | TypeScript | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | source, docker | docker, bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 2,262 | ★ 11,140 |
| First released | 2023 | 2014 |
| Replaces | Contentful, Netlify CMS | WordPress, Wix |
Why pick each one
Choose Keystatic if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (2.3k GitHub stars)
- Written in TypeScript
Choose October CMS if…
- Great for Laravel developers
- Simple, transparent architecture
Frequently asked questions
Is Keystatic or October CMS better?
Neither is universally better. October CMS has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Keystatic and October CMS free and open-source?
Yes. Keystatic is licensed under MIT and October CMS under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Keystatic and October CMS with Docker?
Keystatic: yes. October CMS: yes.