Keycloak vs OpenLDAP
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted identity & sso options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Keycloak
Open-source identity and access management for modern apps
VS
OpenLDAP
The classic open-source Lightweight Directory Access Protocol server
| Feature | Keycloak | OpenLDAP |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Identity & SSO | Identity & SSO |
| License | Apache-2.0 | OLDAP-2.8 |
| Language | Java | C |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, bare-metal | docker, bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 36,058 | ★ 400 |
| First released | 2014 | 1998 |
| Replaces | Okta, Auth0, Microsoft Entra ID | Active Directory |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Keycloak or OpenLDAP better?
Neither is universally better. Keycloak has the larger community; both share a hard setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Keycloak and OpenLDAP free and open-source?
Yes. Keycloak is licensed under Apache-2.0 and OpenLDAP under OLDAP-2.8. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Keycloak and OpenLDAP with Docker?
Keycloak: yes. OpenLDAP: yes.