Buzzfeed sso vs Keycloak
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted identity & sso options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Buzzfeed sso
Self-hosted SSO middleware for OAuth and OIDC
VS
Keycloak
Open-source identity and access management for modern apps
| Feature | Buzzfeed sso | Keycloak |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Identity & SSO | Identity & SSO |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Go | Java |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | docker, kubernetes, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 3,125 | ★ 36,058 |
| First released | 2018 | 2014 |
| Replaces | Cloudflare Access | Okta, Auth0, Microsoft Entra ID |
Why pick each one
Choose Buzzfeed sso if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (3.1k GitHub stars)
- Written in Go
Frequently asked questions
Is Buzzfeed sso or Keycloak better?
Neither is universally better. Keycloak has the larger community, while Buzzfeed sso is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Buzzfeed sso and Keycloak free and open-source?
Yes. Buzzfeed sso is licensed under MIT and Keycloak under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Buzzfeed sso and Keycloak with Docker?
Buzzfeed sso: yes. Keycloak: yes.